Abstract
Many students of statistics and econometrics express frustration with the way a problem known as “bad control” is treated in the traditional literature. The issue arises when the addition of a variable to a regression equation produces an unintended discrepancy between the regression coefficient and the effect that the coefficient is intended to represent. Avoiding such discrepancies presents a challenge to all analysts in the data intensive sciences. This note describes graphical tools for understanding, visualizing, and resolving the problem through a series of illustrative examples. By making this “crash course” accessible to instructors and practitioners, we hope to avail these tools to a broader community of scientists concerned with the causal interpretation of regression models.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 00491241221099552 |
| Pages (from-to) | 1071-1104 |
| Number of pages | 34 |
| Journal | Sociological Methods and Research |
| Volume | 53 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - May 20 2022 |
ASJC Scopus Subject Areas
- Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
- Sociology and Political Science
Keywords
- Dag
- Back-door criterion
- Bad controls
- Causal inference
- Regression