Academic publishing in marketing: Best and worst practices

David W. Stewart

doi:10.1108/09555340810897943

Academic publishing in marketing: Best and worst practices

David W. Stewart

University of Southern California

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	421-434
Number of pages	14
Journal	European Business Review
Volume	20
Issue number	5
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1108/09555340810897943
State	Published - 2008
Externally published	Yes

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

Business and International Management
Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)

Keywords

Academic libraries
Best practice
Marketing
Publishing
Research

Access to Document

10.1108/09555340810897943

Cite this

@article{40c6e2fcdc31434faaead900d0ceb017,

title = "Academic publishing in marketing: Best and worst practices",

keywords = "Academic libraries, Best practice, Marketing, Publishing, Research",

author = "Stewart, \{David W.\}",

year = "2008",

doi = "10.1108/09555340810897943",

language = "English",

volume = "20",

pages = "421--434",

journal = "European Business Review",

issn = "0955-534X",

publisher = "Emerald",

number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Academic publishing in marketing

T2 - Best and worst practices

AU - Stewart, David W.

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

KW - Academic libraries

KW - Best practice

KW - Marketing

KW - Publishing

KW - Research

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/50849100994

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/50849100994#tab=citedBy

U2 - 10.1108/09555340810897943

DO - 10.1108/09555340810897943

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:50849100994

SN - 0955-534X

VL - 20

SP - 421

EP - 434

JO - European Business Review

JF - European Business Review

IS - 5

ER -

Academic publishing in marketing: Best and worst practices

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this