TY - JOUR
T1 - Distributing Indivisible Goods Fairly: Evidence from a Questionnaire Study
AU - Herreiner, Dorothea K.
AU - Puppe, Clemens
N1 - Herreiner, Dorothea K. and Puppe, Clemens, "Distributing Indivisible Goods Fairly: Evidence from a Questionnaire Study", Analyse und Kritik, 29/2, 235-258, 2007.
PY - 2007
Y1 - 2007
N2 - We report the results of a questionnaire study on the fair distribution of indivisible goods. We collected data from three different subject pools, first- and secondyear students majoring in economics, law students, and advanced economics students with some background knowledge of fairness theories. The purpose of this study is to assess the empirical relevance of various fairness criteria such as inequality aversion, the utilitarian principle of maximizing the sum of individual payoffs, the Rawlsian “maximin” principle of maximizing the payoff of the worst-off individual, and the criterion of envy-freeness (in the sense of Foley, 1967).
AB - We report the results of a questionnaire study on the fair distribution of indivisible goods. We collected data from three different subject pools, first- and secondyear students majoring in economics, law students, and advanced economics students with some background knowledge of fairness theories. The purpose of this study is to assess the empirical relevance of various fairness criteria such as inequality aversion, the utilitarian principle of maximizing the sum of individual payoffs, the Rawlsian “maximin” principle of maximizing the payoff of the worst-off individual, and the criterion of envy-freeness (in the sense of Foley, 1967).
UR - https://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/econ_fac/3
M3 - Article
VL - 29
SP - 235
EP - 258
JO - Analyse und Kritik
JF - Analyse und Kritik
IS - 2
ER -