TY - JOUR
T1 - Economic growth and renewable and non-renewable energy consumption
T2 - Evidence from the US states
AU - Salari, Mahmoud
AU - Kelly, Inas
AU - Doytch, Nadia
AU - Javid, Roxana J.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2021/11
Y1 - 2021/11
N2 - Energy consumption and economic growth play an important role in the global policy debate among policymakers around the world. This is the first study to investigate the relationship between economic growth and energy consumption at the state level for the U.S. from 2000 to 2016. As opposed to country-level studies, a focus on states within a country allows for comparisons across more homogeneous entities. The four known hypotheses are tested: growth, conservative, feedback, and neutral, differentiating between renewable and non-renewable energy consumption. In order to address endogeneity, two strategies are developed: (1) a static analysis for 2016 where key policy covariates are gradually added to the model, and (2) a dynamic analysis using different generalized method of moments (GMM) estimators. The model is augmented using socioeconomic, regulatory and climatic variables, which allows for the evaluation of policies while facilitating a transition to renewable energy use. Overall, the results show that total energy consumption and non-renewable energy consumption support the feedback hypothesis. Results for renewable energy, industrial energy, and residential energy consumption show more support for the growth hypothesis. These results have policy implications in terms of optimizing decisions and investments to efficiently improve economic growth while reducing energy consumption.
AB - Energy consumption and economic growth play an important role in the global policy debate among policymakers around the world. This is the first study to investigate the relationship between economic growth and energy consumption at the state level for the U.S. from 2000 to 2016. As opposed to country-level studies, a focus on states within a country allows for comparisons across more homogeneous entities. The four known hypotheses are tested: growth, conservative, feedback, and neutral, differentiating between renewable and non-renewable energy consumption. In order to address endogeneity, two strategies are developed: (1) a static analysis for 2016 where key policy covariates are gradually added to the model, and (2) a dynamic analysis using different generalized method of moments (GMM) estimators. The model is augmented using socioeconomic, regulatory and climatic variables, which allows for the evaluation of policies while facilitating a transition to renewable energy use. Overall, the results show that total energy consumption and non-renewable energy consumption support the feedback hypothesis. Results for renewable energy, industrial energy, and residential energy consumption show more support for the growth hypothesis. These results have policy implications in terms of optimizing decisions and investments to efficiently improve economic growth while reducing energy consumption.
KW - Economic growth
KW - Energy consumption
KW - Real GDP
KW - Renewable and non-renewable energy
KW - State-level analysis
UR - https://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=lmupure2024&SrcAuth=WosAPI&KeyUT=WOS:000690882900004&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=WOS_CPL
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85108425289&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85108425289&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.renene.2021.06.016
DO - 10.1016/j.renene.2021.06.016
M3 - Article
SN - 0960-1481
VL - 178
SP - 50
EP - 65
JO - Renewable Energy
JF - Renewable Energy
ER -