Energeia vs Entelecheia: Schelling on Metaphysics Lambda and the Problem of the Pure Daß

Marcela Garcia Romero

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

In what follows, I will take Schelling’s perspective into account regarding what he considers to be a partial or mistaken reading of Aristotle. There are several indications that this criticism is directed at Hegel, although Schelling does not mention Hegel by name in the particular work on which I concentrate, the Darstellung der reinrationalen Philosophie [DRP]. I will look at the differences between both interpretations but will do so from Schelling’s perspective. Then I will address two problems that Schelling’s use of the Aristotelian “pure actuality”: in what sense the pure actuality can be said to be individual, and what exactly is the role of Schelling’s notion of pure actuality in the transition from “purely rational” to “positive” philosophy which, as he says, depends on the will.
Original languageAmerican English
Pages (from-to)113-137
JournalTópicos Revista de Filosofía
Volume51
Issue number2016
StatePublished - Jul 2016

Cite this