TY - JOUR
T1 - Energeia vs Entelecheia: Schelling on Metaphysics Lambda and the Problem of the Pure Daß
AU - Garcia Romero, Marcela
PY - 2016/7
Y1 - 2016/7
N2 - In what follows, I will take Schelling’s perspective into account regarding what he considers to be a partial or mistaken reading of Aristotle. There are several indications that this criticism is directed at Hegel, although Schelling does not mention Hegel by name in the particular work on which I concentrate, the Darstellung der reinrationalen Philosophie [DRP]. I will look at the differences between both interpretations but will do so from Schelling’s perspective. Then I will address two problems that Schelling’s use of the Aristotelian “pure actuality”: in what sense the pure actuality can be said to be individual, and what exactly is the role of Schelling’s notion of pure actuality in the transition from “purely rational” to “positive” philosophy which, as he says, depends on the will.
AB - In what follows, I will take Schelling’s perspective into account regarding what he considers to be a partial or mistaken reading of Aristotle. There are several indications that this criticism is directed at Hegel, although Schelling does not mention Hegel by name in the particular work on which I concentrate, the Darstellung der reinrationalen Philosophie [DRP]. I will look at the differences between both interpretations but will do so from Schelling’s perspective. Then I will address two problems that Schelling’s use of the Aristotelian “pure actuality”: in what sense the pure actuality can be said to be individual, and what exactly is the role of Schelling’s notion of pure actuality in the transition from “purely rational” to “positive” philosophy which, as he says, depends on the will.
UR - https://www.researchgate.net/publication/304908151_Energeia_vs_Entelecheia_Schelling_on_Metaphysics_Lambda_and_the_Problem_of_the_Pure_Dass
M3 - Article
VL - 51
SP - 113
EP - 137
JO - Tópicos Revista de Filosofía
JF - Tópicos Revista de Filosofía
IS - 2016
ER -