TY - CHAP
T1 - Must Knowledge Be Virtuously Motivated?
AU - Baehr, Jason
N1 - Baehr, Jason. "Must Knowledge Be Virtuously Motivated?" Contemporary Debates in Epistemology. Ed. Steup, Matthias. Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell, 2014.133-51. Print.
PY - 2013
Y1 - 2013
N2 - Zagzebski’s treatment of our question is characteristically rich, innovative, and insightful. As in previous work, she resists certain standard assumptions and categories and in doing so moves the conversation forward in interesting ways. Zagzebski and I apparently agree that knowledge does not require intellectually virtuous motives in the strong sense that a belief counts as knowledge only if, in forming or maintaining it, the believer in question manifests intellectually virtuous motives.
AB - Zagzebski’s treatment of our question is characteristically rich, innovative, and insightful. As in previous work, she resists certain standard assumptions and categories and in doing so moves the conversation forward in interesting ways. Zagzebski and I apparently agree that knowledge does not require intellectually virtuous motives in the strong sense that a belief counts as knowledge only if, in forming or maintaining it, the believer in question manifests intellectually virtuous motives.
KW - theory of knowledge
UR - https://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/phil_fac/20
UR - https://lmu.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/01LMU_INST/1330k3m/alma991022612099708066
M3 - Chapter
SP - 133
EP - 151
BT - Must Knowledge Be Virtuously Motivated?
PB - Wiley-Blackwell
ER -