TY - JOUR
T1 - Schelling’s Theory of Judgment and the Interpretation of the Copula
AU - Garcia Romero, Marcela
PY - 2015
Y1 - 2015
N2 - This paper aims to reconstruct Schelling’s ‘theory of judgment’ following his own account in The Ages of the World (Die Weltalter).I suggest that Schelling develops a notion of judgment as ‘separation of an indistinct, undifferentiated unity in order to achieve a higher, explicit unity’ throughout his different phases, and that the different ways of interpreting the copula correspond systematically to the moments implied by judgment. Furthermore, I underline how his particular understanding of judgment and its moments (undifferentiated unity, separation, explicit unity), in relation to different senses of the copula, allows Schelling to relate the structure of judgment to existence, to underline the difference between potentiality and actuality, and, especially, to discover a structure of judgment that makes room for freedom. Finally, I briefly connect the tension between an identity ‘previous’ to any subject-object distinction and the free activity of uniting what is separate, as found in Schelling’s notion of judgment, to the tension between ‘embodied coping’ and conceptual normative activity in contemporary debates.
AB - This paper aims to reconstruct Schelling’s ‘theory of judgment’ following his own account in The Ages of the World (Die Weltalter).I suggest that Schelling develops a notion of judgment as ‘separation of an indistinct, undifferentiated unity in order to achieve a higher, explicit unity’ throughout his different phases, and that the different ways of interpreting the copula correspond systematically to the moments implied by judgment. Furthermore, I underline how his particular understanding of judgment and its moments (undifferentiated unity, separation, explicit unity), in relation to different senses of the copula, allows Schelling to relate the structure of judgment to existence, to underline the difference between potentiality and actuality, and, especially, to discover a structure of judgment that makes room for freedom. Finally, I briefly connect the tension between an identity ‘previous’ to any subject-object distinction and the free activity of uniting what is separate, as found in Schelling’s notion of judgment, to the tension between ‘embodied coping’ and conceptual normative activity in contemporary debates.
UR - https://www.academia.edu/16415294/Schellings_Theory_of_Judgment_and_the_Interpretation_of_the_Copula
M3 - Article
VL - 3
SP - 25
EP - 49
JO - Internationale Zeitschrift zur klassischen deutschen Philosophie
JF - Internationale Zeitschrift zur klassischen deutschen Philosophie
IS - 2015
ER -