TY - GEN
T1 - Standards-based grading
T2 - 42nd Annual Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE 2012
AU - Carberry, Adam
AU - Siniawski, Matthew T.
AU - Dionisio, John David N.
N1 - pCarberry AR, Siniawski MT, Dionisio JDN. “Standards-based grading: Preliminary studies to quantify changes in student affective and cognitive behaviors.” In emProceedings of IEEE Frontiers in Education (FIE) 2012/em; Seattle, Washington, October 3–6, 2012./p
PY - 2012
Y1 - 2012
N2 - Assessing student learning is a key component to education. Most institutions assess learning using a score-based grading system. Such systems use multiple individual assignment scores to produce a cumulative final course grade, which may or may not represent what a student has learned. Standards-based grading offers an alternative that addresses the need to directly assess how well students are developing toward meeting the course objectives. The course objectives are the focal point of the grading system, allowing the instructor to assess students on clearly defined objectives throughout the course. The system assesses how well students become proficient in the course objectives over the duration of the course. This study extends the use of standards-based grading at the K-12 level into the realm of undergraduate science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education. Five STEM courses pilot tested the integration of a standards-based grading system to investigate how it impacts affective and cognitive student behaviors. The results suggest that a standards-based grading system increased student domain-specific self-efficacy, was perceived as valuable, and helped students develop more sophisticated beliefs about STEM knowledge.
AB - Assessing student learning is a key component to education. Most institutions assess learning using a score-based grading system. Such systems use multiple individual assignment scores to produce a cumulative final course grade, which may or may not represent what a student has learned. Standards-based grading offers an alternative that addresses the need to directly assess how well students are developing toward meeting the course objectives. The course objectives are the focal point of the grading system, allowing the instructor to assess students on clearly defined objectives throughout the course. The system assesses how well students become proficient in the course objectives over the duration of the course. This study extends the use of standards-based grading at the K-12 level into the realm of undergraduate science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education. Five STEM courses pilot tested the integration of a standards-based grading system to investigate how it impacts affective and cognitive student behaviors. The results suggest that a standards-based grading system increased student domain-specific self-efficacy, was perceived as valuable, and helped students develop more sophisticated beliefs about STEM knowledge.
KW - standards-based grading
KW - assessment
KW - student behaviors
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84874714425&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84874714425&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/FIE.2012.6462211
DO - 10.1109/FIE.2012.6462211
M3 - Conference contribution
SN - 9781467313513
T3 - Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE
BT - 2012 Frontiers in Education Conference
Y2 - 3 October 2012 through 6 October 2012
ER -